On Dangerous Ground (1952)

on-dangerous-ground.jpg

Director Nicholas Ray was known for imbuing his thrillers with an almost naive, sad-eyed desperation, and that suits his romantic chase noir, On Dangerous Ground, to a tee. The picture depends upon clichés that were old hat before the talkies, but it transcends them, primarily because we’re more accustomed to encountering them in a romantic melodrama that might more closely resemble Marty than a nastier thriller centering on the hunt for a young girl’s killer. The policeman on the hunt, Jim Wilson (Robert Ryan) sees himself through the killer’s sister’s (Ida Lupino) blind eyes and calls himself out on a life that’s been dominated by cynicism and recklessness. We don’t roll our eyes at the second act pathos, nor the Lupino martyr, we’re instead thrown for a loop, wondering what the hell is going on.

It helps that Ray and Ryan are nearly unrivaled in this sort of business. Ray’s pictures aren’t calculated, but raw, almost uncomfortably melancholy and self-conscious. In a Lonely Place is another picture that starts down a familiar path (Hollywood screenwriter, murder, etc.) only to end on a devastating note of miscommunication and un-purged rage. There’s also, of course, Rebel without a Cause, a picture that never annoys from overexposure, if only because it’s authentically unforgettable, a nightmare exploration of the chasm between the generations (just as In a Lonely Place was exploring the un-crossable differences between the genders). On Dangerous Ground has similar conviction in itself, and Wilson ranks as another refreshingly understated, poignant Ray creation. The first three scenes tell us all: one cop hugs his wife, one cop watches TV with his family, Wilson examines pictures of suspects at the dinner table alone. Too bad the picture feels the need, in the first act, to repeatedly remind us of Wilson’s disillusion with needless dialogue, but even this doesn’t irritate, it contributes to the broad, dreamy vibe of the picture, to its big, broken, bleeding heart.

Ray could’ve gotten all of that out of a mediocre actor (and has) but Robert Ryan appears, in all of the pictures I’ve seen at least, to be incapable of giving of a false or boring performance. Ryan can be terrifying even in pictures that aren’t in his league (check his work in the otherwise just ok Crossfire or Clash by Night, both of which can be found in TCM Noirs Vol.2) but when the film manages to be even somewhat up to him the results can be extraordinary, such as The Set-Up, The Naked Spur, the iconic The Wild Bunch, or even here. Ryan, like many of my favorite leading men, has a fascinating, flexible contradiction about himself, he’s scary, badass, childish, noble, buffoonish all, possibly, at once, and can adjust the ingredients seemingly without effort depending upon the part. Wilson is, like the Bogart character in Place, of the not entirely sane school of broken idealists, needing a saint, someone who can in good faith just plain shut up for a while and deal with it, to purify his potentially lethal spiritual toxicity.

On Dangerous Ground follows a traditional three act structure, but the proportions are unusual and further contribute to the surreal discombobulation of the film, while also managing to further dry out the sentimentality. The film is approximately eighty minutes long, thirty of those are devoted to act one, a chase that has little bearing on the official plot (though it organically fleshes out the Wilson character). By minute thirty-five, Wilson has been summoned to another town (to escape problems sprung from his violent practices) to solve a murder. At this point we settle in, expecting twenty minutes or so of fish out of water plotting, the usual no bullshit cop in strange town burlesque, only to have a townsperson spring into a building in the middle of Wilson’s introduction to the prominent townspeople to announce that he’s seen the killer fleeing. Wilson teams up with the father (Ward Bond, very effective) and the remaining forty-five minutes largely constitute this second chase, with the accelerated romance with Lupino, who isn’t, despite first billing, introduced until about minute forty, as a sideline. The film toys with the formula admirably, and embodies what screenwriters preach of underlining character with action.

My only real regret of On Dangerous Ground is that it doesn’t take full advantage of the possible explosions that could be savored from a Robert Ryan-Ida Lupino collaboration. Lupino has proved herself in other roles to be very much Ryan’s equal, but here she’s saddled with an uninteresting male fantasy. Ray exhausts his imagination with the strange pacing, and his empathy with the Wilson character. It’s hard to fault On Dangerous Ground too much though, it’s an original picture with a fantastic lead performance, a clear, hard, amazing visual style, a haunting Bernard Herrman score, and a good as can be expected secondary performance. You don’t roll your eyes at the final kiss, it’s, despite the shortcuts, earned.

★★★½

Posted on April 23rd, 2008 in Reviews, Crime, Drama, 1952 | 5 Comments

The Narrow Margin (1952)

narrowone.jpg

We’ve somehow managed to initiate an informal “dangers on a train” mini-marathon here at Bowen’s Cinematic. Earlier in the month we covered Hitchcock’s peerless The Lady Vanishes, yesterday we looked at The Taking of Pelham One Two Three, and so today is The Narrow Margin, the noir classic directed by genre veteran Richard Fleischer. The film’s box (courtesy of TCM Noir Set Vol. 2) actually likens Margin to Lady and it’s a testament to Fleischer and screenwriter Earl Felton’s work here that that comparison isn’t laughable, the two pictures would, in fact, make an ideal double bill.

If you’ll indulge me for a moment, The Lady Vanishes is a parfait: a light, masterful medley of tones. The Narrow Margin, on the other hand, is a big, gooey, probably under-baked chocolate brownie that really needs milk to properly dislodge from the throat. Both are delicious, but pleasurable in altogether different ways. Hitchcock’s film is graceful, The Narrow Margin is lean and merciless, a disarmingly blunt, nearly flawless thriller.

By minute five of Margin, we know the good guy, Det. Sgt. Brown (veteran Charles McGraw), the reluctant heroine, Mrs. Frankie Neall (Marie Windsor) and the task at hand, which is to get Mrs. Neall on a train to Los Angeles so she can testify against several of her dead husband’s associates. By minute twelve we’ve killed the good guy’s partner (obligatory even in the 1950s) and shoved the good guy and heroine aboard the train, which, needless to say, contains a few boarders that aren’t so sympathetic to Neal and Brown’s plight.

The remaining hour (totaling a svelte 71 minutes) is pure gravy: narrow escapes, double crosses, and red herrings. Charles McGraw is an ideal embodiment of square-jawed, incorruptible valor, the sort of Dick Tracy-Joe Friday thing that I normally have trouble relating to (they generally strike me as the sort that were bullies as kids, or Republicans as adults). McGraw gets around that, I think, because the film successfully stacks the deck: Brown’s odds are so laughably horrible as to render his determination poignant, even naive. Another key to Brown’s unexpected appeal is McGraw’s wonderful voice, that nothing new to the genre gravel cut with a slight, barely tangible, withheld pain: maybe Brown stepped on a tack before showing up for work that day.

The film’s humor humanizes Brown too, repeatedly scoring points off his self-righteousness. Mrs. Neall isn’t played as a clueless tramp, as many pictures would, she gets some good chewy tough girl dialogue, and McGraw, spittle nearly visible, throws it right back at her. There’s no heat in the movies like that great no-budget, 1950s noir heat, and Fleischer doesn’t go and ruin it by having his characters fuck.

Fleischer’s film is also a remarkable work of common sense, there is one great scene, toward the end, that finds a bad guy cornering a woman in her room and about to shoot the lock off. Many films, even good films, would have the bad guy blow the lock away without giving it the slightest of thoughts. THIS bad guy, however, looks around, sighs, realizes he can’t fire a weapon in a cramped train without stirring chaos, and instead appeals to the boy’s curiosity in the room next door.

The proper climax of the picture that follows a few minutes later is just as ingenious: Brown, powerless for the first time in the picture and still thrown from a clever twist earlier in the film, finds himself having to finally rely on the kind of person he thought he detested, and on the kind of fate he thought didn’t exist. Who knew a tired “don’t judge a book by its cover” sound bite could go down this good? You can’t tell me Hitchcock didn’t see it and, when no one was looking, didn’t smile.

★★★½

Posted on February 27th, 2008 in Reviews, Thriller, 1952 | 2 Comments

© Copyright 2007 Bowen's Cinematic.
Site Designed by Ben Markowitz.
Bowen's Cinematic is powered by WordPress | RSS