Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008)

sarahposter2.jpg

Writer-star Jason Segel and director Nicholas Stoller’s Forgetting Sarah Marshall is a bit more ambitious than the previous Judd Apatow produced or directed odes to unflagging pop-culture enthralled young male self-absorption. The prior films were charged with a bracing, seemingly free form geeks have inherited the world id driven obscenity, laced with an articulation that is at once ironic and celebratory. The heroes of The 40-Year-Old Virgin, Knocked Up and Superbad were the good guys, but they weren’t the PG/PG-13 eunuchs of the 1980s movies getting boxer shorts pulled up their asses by the privileged bullies, they embodied ferocious, empowered, unchecked fuck you will, until, and this is the problem, the pandering sets in, the “we don’t really mean it or want to offend anyone especially the ladies” third act u-turn that finds everyone hooking and growing up on cue, common sense be damned.

Forgetting Sarah Marshall has no such third act turn-around, the film is slower and (just a shade) more reflective from the get go. This may be the first of this current wave of Apatow productions that can be accused of self-consciousness, recognizing the last minute efforts of the heroes of Knocked Up and Superbad to be unconvincing. This film has at its center a more sentimental, wounded hero, a man-child who requires more than a five minute montage of images near the end to figure things out. The picture attempts to dramatize Segel’s in and out, some days good, some days bad road to recovery, after being discarded by the titular woman (Kristen Bell, bland).

The usual stereotypes are all accounted for (shrill ambitious woman, obnoxious, more successful new beau, stoner, confidant) but their dimensions aren’t as pat as the prior films. Marshall has a surprising compassion; the characters are largely good, open, looking for connection. It’s this unexpected, across the board fairness that has critics, ridiculously, likening the picture to the work of Preston Sturges.

The film is also, unfortunately, the slowest of the pictures we’ve mentioned. Segel and Stoller were right to question the conventions of the prior films, but in revising those clichés they muted the wild man party camaraderie that gave the earlier pictures their bite, it’s a gremlins movie without the gremlins. The reliable company players, Paul Rudd, Jonah Hill, Bill Hader, etc. are all bland and inert here, their comic impulses adrift. This film takes too much of its mood from the tranquil Hawaiian waters that serve as the backdrop: this picture is truly about as interesting as watching someone else on vacation. Segel and Stoller have made the Apatow third act somewhat more palatable but in doing so they’ve neglected the first two acts entirely, leaving nothing to distract from the please marry and procreate at the appropriate age woman’s picture formula that remains despite their best intentions. The film mistakes striving for maturity for maturity, lacking the characterizations to justify such a slow tempo. Forgetting Sarah Marshall may, ironically, play worse with the folks who are determined to defend it.

The picture still has its moments, primarily because Segel, always the strangest of the Apatow boys to begin with (he suggests Jim Carrey in an earlier Apatow effort, the underrated The Cable Guy) is an appealingly lumpy, unconventional (even for Apatow) leading man. Unlike that force of nature Seth Rogen, or Hill, Segel doesn’t bless his character Peter with confidence in his own obsessions, which include an ambition to stage a more autobiographical than he knows puppet musical of Dracula. The film’s one legitimately original moment takes off from this admirably bizarre conceit: the girl of redemption and second chances (Mila Kunis, more appealing than expected, but has nothing to work with) sets Peter up, without his knowing, to sing a song from his unfinished project. Peter isn’t sure of course, he isn’t sure of anything other than his need to glob onto another woman, but he takes the stage, and wins over the drunk, impatient patrons of the bar with a song of surprising conviction (he even does the sub-Transylvanian thing) that briefly takes over the movie. Peter sheds his self-loathing fully, convincingly, and it’s a wonderful moment.

There are a few other moments that threaten to jump the tracks of formula as well. Russell Brand’s Aldous Snow, Sarah’s new rock star beau, is almost completely unoriginal, save an unexpected kinship with Peter. Peter and Aldous find themselves surfing together, and Peter, unable to deny it any longer, exclaims “God, you’re cool.” It’s a disarming, poignant scene; an emotionally naked moment that the filmmakers refuse to capitalize on.

Moments such as these prove we should be harder on Apatow and his talented camp of hooligans. These guys are too promising to be wasting their and our time replicating the same clichéd rubbish over and over again. The audiences’ taking it doesn’t surprise me, but the critics’ refusal to call foul is disappointing. Forgetting Sarah Marshall is better than most any mainstream young person romantic comedy that will probably come out in the near future, but what’s that saying exactly? It’s time to change the criterion by which we judge these men, time to up the ante, because, at this point, the Apatow guys are treading closer and closer to dangerous waters, to making the sorts of movies they would’ve ridiculed before they were famous.

★★½

Posted on April 19th, 2008 in Reviews, Comedy, 2008 |

9 Responses to “Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008)”

  1. K. Bowen Says:

    Well, you know I totally disagree. But a nice, balanced review nonetheless.

  2. Chuck Says:

    Yeah, I didn’t hate it, but we agree on the most important point K, and that’s the ridiculous critical reception this film has received. Critics are selling out (for money, hiptitude, etc) just as willingly as the filmmakers and audiences, only they are the only ones, it seems, that are never called on it. And that, as you wrote on your site, is dangerous and sad.

  3. christian Says:

    I’m always amazed at how eager a lot of critics are to appear hip. The over-praising of Apatow comes to mind. Preston Sturges? No.

  4. K. Bowen Says:

    It startles me that right now, the critical community can polarize over The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford, but give a consensus big thumbs up on Forgetting Sarah Marshall.

    Apatow isn’t even Wes Anderson. My standard line on Apatow: When I watch a Wes Anderson film, I wonder what books and French films he’s been watching. When I watch a Judd Apatow film, I wonder what sitcoms he’s been watching. When Apatow makes a film near the quality of Rushmore or Bottle Rocket or Tennenbaums, I’ll get excited. Until then ….

    I think Christian is right on this one. I think a number of critics are gaming the thing, trying to appear to be “with it.”

  5. Travis Says:

    I haven’t seen this movie yet, and I can sympathize the wish for Apatow’s troupe to stretch itself. That said, I’ve enjoyed seeing all of his movies. Typically, I find them funny, magnanimous, and very pleasant. Seeing an Apatow movie fulfills a different need than seeing, say, a P.T. Anderson (or Wes Anderson) movie, but it’s a fulfillment nonetheless. I’ll have more to say about this after I see it, obviously.

  6. Chuck Says:

    All of the shameless Apatow groupies on the internet should re-watch the scenes in Almost Famous with Hoffman’s version of Lester Bangs. “Be savage and unmerciful.” What did he call the whole shabam? An industry of cool?

  7. Travis Says:

    Just saw this one last night; you’re right: it’s occassionally amusing but thoroughly flaccid and disappointing. No bite. I didn’t even really think the dracula thing was any good. I will say that Mila Kunis looked hot, if over-tanned.

  8. Daniel Says:

    That’s a great last line to your review, Chuck. Between you not absolutely hating it and the positive RT reviews, I’m wondering if I should have seen this when I had the chance. Maybe I’ll catch it at the discount theater, at which point I’ll come back to your review.

  9. Chuck Says:

    Thanks Daniel. Discount theatre is the way to go I think.

Leave a Reply

© Copyright 2007 Bowen's Cinematic.
Site Designed by Ben Markowitz.
Bowen's Cinematic is powered by WordPress.