Day Thirty-One: John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982)

200px-thething1982poster.jpg

And so we reach the end. I, after some debate, have decided to conclude our little month long thing here with one of my very favorite movies of any genre, John Carpenter’s The Thing. There’s a strange thing about Carpenter’s film, I re-watch it once a year, and I always forget some of the surprises of the movie, the identity of some of the attackers, the timing of some of the scares. The Thing is an almost incomparably satisfying shocker, and it’s a horror movie that keeps on giving throughout the years.

I remember that creepy VHS cover of The Thing in the video store when I was child, showing a man in a heavy coat with a face that appears to be a pure beam of light. The cover promised the ultimate in alien terror, and I was too young to find that honor dubious. I also remember early conversations with my father regarding The Thing; he considered it a gory, junky reworking of a movie he held dear, the 1951 Howard Hawks film of the same name. At the time my dad’s opinion was scripture, and I assumed that it was some mental infirmity that kept me from understanding that the 1951 version was better when the Carpenter movie chilled me so much more.

The mental infirmities issue may have never been entirely worked out, but it has nothing to do with preferring the Carpenter approach to the story. I don’t wish to have a Thing cage match here, I think the Hawks version is very good, and holds up remarkably well. But Carpenter’s is scarier, and takes a track similar to one of the incarnations of Invasion of the Body Snatchers or perhaps an early Cronenberg film, the thing isn’t a giant vegetable space man. It’s you, or your buddy; unless it’s provoked and forced to reveal an ever changing true form that’s an incalculably hideous combination of every specie it’s come in contact with.

Carpenter’s film doesn’t have the deeper sociological scares of a Cronenberg or Body Snatchers movie; it’s a mean, single minded thing that’s only interested in scaring you. Carpenter is a long time Howard Hawks aficionado, and he’s revisited Hawks subject matter time and time again, so it’s a wonderful bit of poetic justice that he finds his masterpiece in a remake of a Hawks film. Like The Texas Chain Saw Massacre, The Thing is one of those magic movies where everything goes right. Carpenter’s usual habits, which can be mannered and overly ticky in lesser films, serve him in The Thing.

thing4.jpg

The bare character development fits the limited time frame of the story, and adds an element of impersonality that makes the thing’s assimilation that much scarier. The clean, uncluttered, very obviously composed framing suits the wide open Antarctic desolation beautifully, the minimal (usually synth) score (by Ennio Morricone, though he’s been directed by Carpenter to do a Carpenter impersonation.) is the best to grace a Carpenter film. I remember humming both The Thing and The Shining scores at an early age, I couldn’t get them out of my head.

Russell gives his most authoritative performance here as MacReady. It’s inarguable that Russell is, disappointing filmography be damned, one of our definitive badasses. It’s also no accident that he was asked to do a John Wayne impersonation in Death Proof. Russell has the same man’s man vibe; an I don’t give a shit because I don’t have to give a shit electricity that can’t be faked. Russell is also a better actor than Wayne, funnier, looser, and can play more of an everyman without compromising said badassery.

MacReady is more effective than Snake Plissken because there’s no quote marks around him, MacReady isn’t a goof, and his motivations are fueled by a basic, unglorified self-preservation that this picture’s script builds to quite elegantly. Russell has a few great tough guy lines here, my favorite (I’m paraphrasing) being his response to Wilford Brimley’s plea that he doesn’t know who to trust: “Trust is a tough thing to come by these days.” It’s a very movie line, but it’s delivered as a desperate throwaway, Russell’s attempt to keep face in an increasingly terrifying situation.

Hawks famously said that a good movie should have three good scenes and no bad ones. This is the one Carpenter film that passes that test. Besides the exchange I just mentioned between Russell and Brimley, there’s the justifiably famous “alien blood test” scene, and the ending, which is one of the best of all horror movies. Russell and Keith David sit down in the snow and watch as the remains of their compound, their only shelter and means of heat, slowly die. They have a drink, and smile, and slowly drift towards death themselves. After all the carnage that has taken place, these two are allowed the dignified demise of a Howard Hawks hero. Except one of the heroes may not be human, and he may not be dead. Only contagious.

★★★★

Posted on October 31st, 2007 in Reviews, Horror, 31 Days of Horror, 1982 |

6 Responses to “Day Thirty-One: John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982)”

  1. Travis Says:

    Well, Chuck, congrats. You made it through 31 days of horror. I’m looking forward to your upcoming 30 days of Turkeys for the month of November. That’s a lot of bad movies…

  2. Bowen Says:

    Actually not a bad idea, though I’m not quite ready for another 30 day commitment, and it may be a little mean spirited to actively seek 30 pans in a row. I don’t know though, mean spirited? Long commitment? Gimmicky? I’m talking myself into it.

  3. Travis Says:

    All I ask is for a nice VA film festival report. Are you going to see The Savages?

  4. cjKennedy Says:

    I second Travis with the congratulations Chuck. You did a terrific job and even more importantly I’ve got a lot of new (to me) horror in my Netflix queue.

    I’m glad you mixed it up with old and new spanning many subgenres.

    Nice work.

  5. joel Says:

    Nicely done, Chuck. Carpenter’s The Thing remains one of my all-time favorite horror movies and it’s even more impressive that the practical effects of this film continue to hold up in the age of CGI. The cast is great, the location shooting (and set-work back in Hollywood) is perfect, and the script works like gangbusters on the psyche. There have been numerous efforts to make a sequel, prequel, or remake of this film in the last ten years since the excellent initial DVD release rekindled popular interest in Carpenter’s best film, but luckily all of those have (so far) fizzled out. It would be a shame to attempt to add anything to a film that stands so well on it’s own and any sort of remake would be an insult on its face.

    I am also a huge fan of Kurt Russell and although I think he’s done much of his most memorable work with Carpenter, his more realistic and rounded acting performance is in The Thing. Macready is just so tired, of his job, his life, everything. When things start getting weird, he perks up just enough to stay one step ahead of the violence but that weariness is still there, right up into that last scene.

    Great movie. I’ve seen it (and the DVD making of doc) more times than I count and I never tire of it. That’s the true test of any film, especially one in the horror genre.

  6. Bowen Says:

    What can I say? Agreed on all points Joel. I love that little moment in the movie, right in the beginning, where McCready pours his drink into the computer chess game. It’s a twenty second scene and you already know exactly where this man is coming from.

    Thanks for stopping by, hope to hear from you again.

Leave a Reply

© Copyright 2007 Bowen's Cinematic.
Site Designed by Ben Markowitz.
Bowen's Cinematic is powered by WordPress.